Forum Post

Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

Last post 10-15-2009 2:45 PM by Dog_ma. 19 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (20 items) 1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 09-20-2009 9:31 AM

    Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Soo...I saw this on another one of my lists. It seems that Mr. Frawley has caught on to the power of using markers and rewards/food in training...this year Leerburg has produced two new DVD's:

    The Power of Training Dogs with Food, and The Power of Training Dogs with Markers......

    Now, I haven't watched them,

    From http://leerburg.com/219.htm


    I had been training dogs for almost 45 years when I started to learn this system. I felt like a kid in a candy store when I saw how well it worked and the attitude of my dogs that were being trained with markers. The fact is I still feel like that when I see dogs work with markers.

    It was not than many years ago (in 1990’s) that I was pretty vocal about how stupid I thought clicker training was. Those comments were made from a position of ignorance and a lack of understanding. Simply put, I was dead wrong and I made those comments without knowing the details of how the system worked. The power of marker training lies in understanding and applying the details.


    Since the early 1900’s dog training has been an evolving skill. We only need to look back to the 1970’s and the methods of William Kholer or Winifred Strickland to see how far dog training has improved is the last 25 years. In my opinion no one is ever going to reinvent a better way to train dogs than with markers. The only thing that we will see change will be people who do a better job of applying this method of dog training.

    Very interesting indeed. I really am happy to see that once all trainers, of any philosophy, open up their minds and thoughts, that one can see quite easily that using a marker in training (what people call clicker training) is a very sound, valid, reliable, and exceptional science.

    At first I guessed that Mr. Frawley simply jumped on the bandwagon for financial reasons, but in reading some of the marker and food-training things on his site, I think that he genuinely does have an interest in making this a permanent, and valuable, part of his training program. And for that, I applaud him.


    Zipper, 6 yo.
    Gaci, 5 yo.
    Shimmer, 2.5 yo.
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-20-2009 9:32 AM In reply to Kim_MacMillan

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    This is an interesting article as well...I haven't totally finished reading it yet so I can't really discuss it, but for interest's sake:
    http://leerburg.com/markers.htm


    Zipper, 6 yo.
    Gaci, 5 yo.
    Shimmer, 2.5 yo.
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-20-2009 2:10 PM In reply to Kim_MacMillan

    • Chuffy
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 12-17-2006
    • UK
    • Posts 7,410
    • Points 145

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    <<does a double take>>

    YOWZA!

     

    Will read the articles and come back later to comment.....  Blimey!  It's one of those sayings isn't it... like "When He** freezes over" or "When <insert rubbish team here> win the league" or "When Frawley uses clicker training"....

    Gosh.

     

    Thanks for posting... I will definitely read these articles!

     



    "Give a man a fire and he is warm for a day, but set fire to him and he is warm for the rest of his life." - Pratchett, "Jingo"

    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-20-2009 6:27 PM In reply to Chuffy

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Frawley's kind of an ***, talks big of himself, just has a very loud, headstrong personality and that's simply who he is....but yes he's a big supporter of marker based training in foundation work, as is Michael Ellis.  In fact most if not all SchH trainers worth their weight do marker based foundation training.  I've yet to meet a SchH trainer or competitor that doesn't.  I think Frawley's really one of the later ones to "get on the bandwagon".


    http://vankelderdogs.dutchbingo.net
    http://www.schhmi.com
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-20-2009 6:31 PM In reply to Liesje

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Here's Ellis' video lectures, pretty nice summary of how he uses marker training for foundation work, and how he introduces working through frustration by learning to "yeild to the leash" (same technique my purely positive all-breed obedience trainer teaches in our beginner and CGC classes).

    http://michaelellisschool.com/


    http://vankelderdogs.dutchbingo.net
    http://www.schhmi.com
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-20-2009 6:48 PM In reply to Liesje

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Yes, I believe he says that Michael Ellis is the one that made him *see the light* when it comes to marker training.


    Zipper, 6 yo.
    Gaci, 5 yo.
    Shimmer, 2.5 yo.
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-20-2009 7:35 PM In reply to Kim_MacMillan

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    I think Michael Ellis is the real "brains", so to speak.  Frawley has the "presence" to push the agenda and sell all the DVDs and training aids, but is he training and competing with his dogs?  Hmmmm....  I'm glad he's been open about being wrong.  Now if only he will change his views on raising a SchH puppy....


    http://vankelderdogs.dutchbingo.net
    http://www.schhmi.com
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-20-2009 11:43 PM In reply to Liesje

    • Jason L
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 09-17-2009
    • Posts 86
    • Points 0

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Are you talking about the video where Frawley said NO ONE but the owner should ever touch the sch pup? (forgot the name of the dvd)
    Photobucket
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-21-2009 8:19 AM In reply to Jason L

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Jason L:
    Are you talking about the video where Frawley said NO ONE but the owner should ever touch the sch pup? (forgot the name of the dvd)
     

    I never saw a vid but read an article and yeah, it was basically saying no one could touch it, don't worry about socialization b/c it's a "working dog" so all it needs to know is you and SchH, bla bla bla...


    http://vankelderdogs.dutchbingo.net
    http://www.schhmi.com
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-21-2009 9:13 AM In reply to Liesje

    • Jason L
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 09-17-2009
    • Posts 86
    • Points 0

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    I would hate to see what a sch pup raised that way will look like or how the heck it's even going to pass his BH. It will probably be no different than those bully dogs you see left tied out all day in the yard. BTW, I know a bit about how you raised Nikon from the other board and I think it's really cool that Nikon gets to hang out with the other two dogs and just be a dog when he is not training. Too often I hear about how if you don't isolate the dog, you're not going to build a strong bond, etc. Obviously you need to make sure that you spend some one on one time with each dog and make sure they don't run wild together all day long but I just can't see myself crating one dog all day and keeping him away from everyone else in the name of performance.
    Photobucket
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-21-2009 9:35 AM In reply to Jason L

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Thanks Jason.  I was worried about the bond thing but now I see it's a load of bull.  Your dog will bond with you if YOU make it happen.  I think the only reason the dogs will bond more strongly to each other and ignore you is if you aren't doing anything to build that bond.  As a pup, Nikon was only restricted to crates or pens when I was housebreaking and keeping him from chewing.  Other than that, he's always had access to the other dogs, the yard, and the house.  I have toy bins and dog toys littering my house and yard, and guess what he has the same if not more ball drive than all of the other dogs at our SchH club.  I let him play tug with me and other dogs and guess what, he has a full, strong grip and is on a trial sleeve at 12 months.  I refuse to crate and kennel my dog just to bring out every ounce of drive.  If I needed to resort to that then he would not be doing SchH.  I do crate or give a rest period after a session of training but this is for the dog's safety.  If he tracked, he ate a lot of food, and if he was doing ob or bitework, he worked hard physically so he needs to rest because he's a crazy, drivey dog that doesn't know his own limits.  Our club is almost 2 hours away though, so there's a built in rest period for him while we're driving home.


    http://vankelderdogs.dutchbingo.net
    http://www.schhmi.com
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-21-2009 12:15 PM In reply to Liesje

    • Jason L
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 09-17-2009
    • Posts 86
    • Points 0

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Lies,

    Totally agree. It's like table training a dog to bring out aggression. IMO either the dog has the aggression or it doesn't. Trying to artificially create that aggression is crazy ... and I'm not even sure how effective (will the dog have the same kind of aggression when he is in a situation where he has the option to flee - like in a trial?)

     By the way, how would you rate Nikon's drive? Med? High? Drive wise, is he turning out to be what you were expecting/wanting?

    Photobucket
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-21-2009 1:29 PM In reply to Jason L

    • CoBuHe
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on 08-03-2007
    • Southeast Texas
    • Posts 2,540
    • Points 85

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    So glad to hear that Frawley is making his way into the 21st century.  He and his training methods have been old school to say the least.  He admitted that himself a few years ago.  The Leerburg articles, website, forum and DVDs are good for those that have hard tempered dogs.  His methods (or maybe I can now say "old" methods) could be so detrimental for the soft tempered dog and the novice owner.

    "No matter how little money and how few possessions you own, having a dog makes you rich." Louis Sabin
    ________________________
    Barbara, Proudly owned by
    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-21-2009 10:25 PM In reply to CoBuHe

    • ron2
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-10-2007
    • far north central Texas
    • Posts 11,404
    • Points 595

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    Or it could be that marker training is so accurate and efficient that it becomes evident, even to such a person as Frawley, how valuable and efficient it is, producing remarkable results, including a dog that is not afraid of you but is motivated to do what it is you want because it's win-win for both human and dog. Anyway, good for him for learning. I know it takes some strength to admit when you have learned something.

     

    The way you treat your dog in this life determines your place in heaven. - chukchi proverb


    • Post Points: 0
  • 09-22-2009 12:26 PM In reply to ron2

    Re: Ed Frawley of Leerburg goes positive??

    And that most SchH trainers already did/do marker training but for some reason thought clickers themselves were stupid even though they were using the same theory, just using a word and a tug toy instead of a click and a treat.  The difference is in SchH, for most dogs, food motivation does not escalate the drive to a high enough level even though it works perfectly well for AKC obedience, CGC, those types of training.  But when I tell Nikon to "platz" and then say "yes, OK!" the second his belly hits and let him lunge for the tug or ball, it's the same thing as clicking and handing him a treat, just with a higher level of drive.  I think the SchH trainers have realized that just because we need that escalated drive does not mean teaching and proofing the skills have to have a different method.  You don't need to counter high drive with a harsh physical correction or coercive methods.  I have often seen dogs being trained in other venues exclusively with positive methods, mostly marker training, with high levels of drive and said "wow your dog would be awesome in SchH!" (like Aussies, JRTs, etc).

    In the end though, the people you see achieving "remarkable results" will use corrections and coercive methods at a certain point.  But IMO there is no reason why all the puppy training and foundation work would not be done using postive marker training.


    http://vankelderdogs.dutchbingo.net
    http://www.schhmi.com
    • Post Points: 0
Page 1 of 2 (20 items) 1 2 Next >
 
 
Contact Us | Help | Rules & Conduct | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | About Us
Copyright 2007, PetsUnited LLC